Member of:
Justia Lawyer Rating
American Association for Justice
NYSTLA
Union Plus
AARP

Family Court Act Article 10, Child Protective Services Part 2, § 1022: Preliminary Orders of Court Before Petition Filed

If a child is suspected to be the victim of abuse or neglect, New York law gives certain designated people the authority to remove the child from the custody of his or her parents or the person who is legally responsible for the child. There are 3 different ways that law enforcement or a social services agency may remove a child: by getting the consent of the parents, by getting a court order, or immediately based on an emergency situation. If a order of the court is sought before removing a child, typically a petition must be filed, a hearing held, and then a court order issued. However, under New York Family Court Act Article 10, Child Protective Services Part 2, § 1022, there are circumstances under which a preliminary order will be issued by the court before a petition is filed. In order for the Family Court to do so the following conditions must exist:

  1. The parent or person legally responsible for the child must be absent and it must appear as if the child has suffered from abuse or neglect from that person.
  2. Immediate removal of the child is necessary to avoid imminent danger to the child's life or health;
  3. There is not enough time to file a petition and hold a hearing as required.

Furthermore, the court must find that it would be in the best interests of the child that he or she is removed from the residence.

Example

6-year-old Lucy was playing in a playground with several other kids. While she fell while using a swing. Portia's mother, Diane, noticed Lucy fall and helped her get up. As she helped Lucy dust herself off, she noticed strange marks and bruises on her stomach and back. When Diane asked Lucy how she got the bruises, Lucy told Diane that she was not allowed to talk about it. Diane tried to find Lucy's mom or dad, but they were not at the playground with Lucy. Diane pulled out her cell phone and called the police. The police officer accompanied Lucy home. Upon speaking with Lucy's mom, the officer felt that Lucy should be removed from the home because he suspected that her mom or some other person who had regular access to Lucy was abusing Lucy. Lucy's mom refused to consent to Lucy being removed from her home. The police called a representative from a social services agency who also spoke with Lucy's mom. When Lucy's mom continued to refuse to allow Lucy to be removed from the home, the representative from the social services agency decided to seek a preliminary order to remove Lucy from the custody of her mom.

Under these circumstances the court would likely issue a preliminary order before a petition is filed under New York Family Court Act § 1022. The bruises on Lucy's body are evidence that she was being abused and her mother refused to consent to removal.

Related Statutory Provisions
  1. Temporary removal with consent: New York Family Court Act, Article 10, Child Protective Services, Part 2, § 1021
  2. Preliminary orders of court before petition filed: New York Family Court Act, Article 10, Child Protective Services, Part 2, § 1022
  3. Emergency removal without court order: New York Family Court Act, Article 10, Child Protective Services, Part 2, § 1024
Remedy

If your child has been removed from your custody without your consent based on a court order under New York Family Court Act Article 10, Child Protective Services Part 2, § 1022because there was suspicion that your child was being abused or neglected, you have the right to seek the return of the child to your custody under New York Family Court Act Article 10, Child Protective Services Part 2, § 1028. You would be required to request a hearing. At the hearing a Family Court judge will make a decision regarding the circumstances under which you child will be returned to your custody.

New York Family Court Act Article 10, Child Protective Services Part 2, § 1022: Preliminary orders of court before petition filed
  1. (i) The family court may enter an order directing the temporary removal of a child from the place where he or she is residing before the filing of a petition under this article, if (A) the parent or other person legally responsible for the child's care is absent or, though present, was asked and refused to consent to the temporary removal of the child and was informed of an intent to apply for an order under this § and of the information required by § one thousand twenty-three of this part; and (B) the child appears so to suffer from the abuse or neglect of his or her parent or other person legally responsible for his or her care that his or her immediate removal is necessary to avoid imminent danger to the child's life or health; and (C) there is not enough time to file a petition and hold a preliminary hearing under § one thousand twenty-seven of this part. (ii) When a child protective agency applies to a court for the immediate removal of a child pursuant to this subdivision, the court shall calendar the matter for that day and shall continue the matter on successive subsequent court days, if necessary, until a decision is made by the court. (iii) In determining whether temporary removal of the child is necessary to avoid imminent risk to the child's life or health, the court shall consider and determine in its order whether continuation in the child's home would be contrary to the best interests of the child and where appropriate, whether reasonable efforts were made prior to the date of application for the order directing such temporary removal to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the home. If the court determines that reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the home were not made but that the lack of such efforts was appropriate under the circumstances, the court order shall include such a finding. (iv) If the court determines that reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the home were not made but that such efforts were appropriate under the circumstances, the court shall order the child protective agency to provide or arrange for the provision of appropriate services or assistance to the child and the child's family pursuant to § one thousand fifteen-a of this article or subdivision (c) of this §. (v) The court shall also consider and determine whether imminent risk to the child would be eliminated by the issuance of a temporary order of protection, pursuant to § one thousand twenty-nine of this part, directing the removal of a person or persons from the child's residence. (vi) Any order directing the temporary removal of a child pursuant to this § shall state the court's findings with respect to the necessity of such removal, whether the respondent was present at the hearing and, if not, what notice the respondent was given of the hearing, whether the respondent was represented by counsel, and, if not, whether the respondent waived his or her right to counsel. (vii) At the conclusion of a hearing where it has been determined that a child should be removed from his or her parent or other person legally responsible, the court shall set the date certain for an initial permanency hearing pursuant to paragraph two of subdivision (a) of § one thousand eighty-nine of this act. The date certain shall be included in the written order issued pursuant to subdivision (b) of this § and shall set forth the date certain scheduled for the permanency hearing.
  2. Any written order pursuant to this § shall be issued immediately, but in no event later than the next court day following the removal of the child. The order shall specify the facility to which the child is to be brought. Except for good cause shown or unless the child is sooner returned to the place where he or she was residing, a petition shall be filed under this article within three court days of the issuance of the order. The court shall hold a hearing pursuant to § one thousand twenty-seven of this part no later than the next court day following the filing of the petition if the respondent was not present, or was present and unrepresented by counsel, and has not waived his or her right to counsel, for the hearing pursuant to this §.
  3. The family court, before the filing of a petition under this article, may enter an order authorizing the provision of services or assistance, including authorizing a physician or hospital to provide emergency medical or surgical procedures, if (i) such procedures are necessary to safeguard the life or health of the child; and (ii) there is not enough time to file a petition and hold a preliminary hearing under § one thousand twenty-seven. Where the court orders a social services official to provide or contract for services or assistance pursuant to this §, such order shall be limited to services or assistance authorized or required to be made available pursuant to the comprehensive annual services program plan then in effect.
  4. The person removing the child shall, coincident with removal, give written notice to the parent or other person legally responsible for the child's care of the right to apply to the family court for the return of the child pursuant to § one thousand twenty-eight of this act, the name, title, organization, address and telephone number of the person removing the child, the name and telephone number of the child care agency to which the child will be taken, if available, the telephone number of the person to be contacted for visits with the child, and the information required by § one thousand twenty-three of this act. Such notice shall be personally served upon the parent or other person at the residence of the child provided, that if such person is not present at the child's residence at the time of removal, a copy of the notice shall be affixed to the door of such residence and a copy shall be mailed to such person at his or her last known place of residence within twenty-four hours after the removal of the child. If the place of removal is not the child's residence, a copy of the notice shall be personally served upon the parent or person legally responsible for the child's care forthwith, or affixed to the door of the child's residence and mailed to the parent or other person legally responsible for the child's care at his or her last known place of residence within twenty-four hours after the removal. The form of the notice shall be prescribed by the chief administrator of the courts.
  5. Nothing in this § shall be deemed to require that the court order the temporary removal of a child as a condition of ordering services or assistance, including emergency medical or surgical procedures pursuant to subdivision (c) of this §.
  6. The court may issue a temporary order of protection pursuant to § ten hundred twenty-nine of this article as an alternative to or in conjunction with any other order or disposition authorized under this §.
New York Preliminary Orders of Court before Petition Filed Lawyer

If your child has been removed from your custody without your consent the law allows you to petition the Family Court to have your child returned to you. In order to ensure that your rights are protected during this hearing, it is important that you are represented by someone who has experience. The staff at Stephen Bilkis & Associates, PLLC has years of experience successfully representing clients in New York Family Court who are involved in disputes related to child custody. Contact us at 800.696.9529 to schedule a free, no obligation consultation regarding your case. We serve those involved in Family Court matters in the following locations:

Client Reviews
★★★★★
My ex-husband hadn't paid child support or the mortgage on the house as he was supposed to. Stephen Bilkis and his team of lawyers were amazing. They stopped the foreclosure on the house, Got a judgment against him and most importantly kept me and my children in the house. Can't say enough good things about him in the firm their compassion hard work and dedication were exceptional. I.G.
★★★★★
From the very first phone call to Stephen Bilkis' office, the staff was extremely polite and helpful in assisting me. Mr. Bilkis was honest and upfront with me from the beginning in what he projected the outcome of my case would be; in the end we got better results than either of us anticipated. He was very genuine and compassionate in understanding my situation and how this legal matter could effect not only myself but my family as well. I highly recommend this law firm and will most definitely continue using them for any future legal needs. Jarrett
★★★★★
Stephen has handled numerous estate matters, criminal matters and family court matters effectively and with a goal-oriented approach. He gets great results and is a results-oriented attorney. Dustin